{rfName}
Be

License and use

Icono OpenAccess

Altmetrics

Analysis of institutional authors

Seebach, SAuthor

Share

Publications
>
Article

Between reality and imagination, between you and me: Emotions and daydreaming in times of electronic communication

Publicated to:New Media & Society. 18 (10): 2395-2412 - 2016-11-01 18(10), DOI: 10.1177/1461444815586985

Authors: Canto-Mila, Natalia; Nunez-Mosteo, Francesc; Seebach, Swen;

Affiliations

Abstract

Keywords

Electronic communicationImaginationLoveNon-momentsNon-placesPartnership

Quality index

Bibliometric impact. Analysis of the contribution and dissemination channel

The work has been published in the journal New Media & Society due to its progression and the good impact it has achieved in recent years, according to the agency WoS (JCR), it has become a reference in its field. In the year of publication of the work, 2016, it was in position 1/79, thus managing to position itself as a Q1 (Primer Cuartil), in the category Communication.

From a relative perspective, and based on the normalized impact indicator calculated from the Field Citation Ratio (FCR) of the Dimensions source, it yields a value of: 13.87, which indicates that, compared to works in the same discipline and in the same year of publication, it ranks as a work cited above average. (source consulted: Dimensions Jun 2025)

Specifically, and according to different indexing agencies, this work has accumulated citations as of 2025-06-06, the following number of citations:

  • WoS: 6
  • Scopus: 6
  • OpenCitations: 5

Impact and social visibility

From the perspective of influence or social adoption, and based on metrics associated with mentions and interactions provided by agencies specializing in calculating the so-called "Alternative or Social Metrics," we can highlight as of 2025-06-06:

  • The use, from an academic perspective evidenced by the Altmetric agency indicator referring to aggregations made by the personal bibliographic manager Mendeley, gives us a total of: 20.
  • The use of this contribution in bookmarks, code forks, additions to favorite lists for recurrent reading, as well as general views, indicates that someone is using the publication as a basis for their current work. This may be a notable indicator of future more formal and academic citations. This claim is supported by the result of the "Capture" indicator, which yields a total of: 20 (PlumX).

With a more dissemination-oriented intent and targeting more general audiences, we can observe other more global scores such as:

  • The Total Score from Altmetric: 2.25.
  • The number of mentions on the social network Facebook: 1 (Altmetric).
  • The number of mentions on the social network X (formerly Twitter): 3 (Altmetric).

It is essential to present evidence supporting full alignment with institutional principles and guidelines on Open Science and the Conservation and Dissemination of Intellectual Heritage. A clear example of this is:

  • The work has been submitted to a journal whose editorial policy allows open Open Access publication.

Leadership analysis of institutional authors

There is a significant leadership presence as some of the institution’s authors appear as the first or last signer, detailed as follows: Last Author (Seebach, Swen).